Saturday 27 July 2013

The P Word

GCSB, spying, privacy - a favourite topic amongst journalists at the moment. Here are some of my thoughts on privacy (privacy in general, not just in relation to the government spying on us through the GCSB.

Where did this idea of privacy come from? To me it seems that privacy, at least in the sense that that word is usually used these days, is a 21st century invention. What happened to the days when people knew their neighbours and everyone knew everything about everyone else in their community? How did we get from there to such an individualistic world where anyone can see a picture of what you had for lunch but your neighbours don't know your name and nobody knows you are suffering from PTSD after that earthquake or plane crash you were in?

It seems rather hypocritical to be sharing so much with social media and at the same time fiercely defending the right to privacy. You have a right to privacy. You exercise it by not sharing certain things with social media. If you don't want people to know you have a boyfriend yet, don't post pictures of the two of you on facebook. You can choose how much you share and who you share it with. If people readily shared more than just superficial stuff on social media would the p word be mumbled about so much whenever there's a hint of something deeper on social media? And if you do start sharing less superficial stuff you'll be less likely to be hidden or de-friended by people who get annoyed by your 20 meaningless facebook posts a day.

I know people argue that they don't want the government to know much about them but again, you choose how much you put in public spaces and unless you've done something the police could charge you for why do you care if the government sees stuff? Then the argument continues to say that they don't want the government to use stuff against them. A very valid point if this were China or somewhere in the Middle East. If our government did start using peoples' facebook posts against them we might have bigger things to worry about - like how to get rid of such a government and all the other bad things a government that has no problem with using social media against people might be inclined to do to its people.

ps. this doesn't mean I've shifted to the right and support the GCSB Bill. I'm against the Bill, partly because there are still many unanswered questions, partly because the government has refused to listen to the multitude of criticism, partly because I don't like National, partly because it's reactionary legislating rather than properly thought out and investigated legislating, and partly because it's unclear which other governments information will be shared with and what they will do with it.

Sunday 21 July 2013

What do you do

"What do you do?" That question was annoying and awkward to answer when I was unemployed, especially when I wanted to answer it without saying the word 'unemployed'. Since I've been working my attitude to being asked that question has changed. I'm sure there are some jobs that would be conversation stoppers. If I said I was a rubbish truck driver I'm sure the conversation would either stop there or quickly change topics. Saying I work at the Waitangi Tribunal has led to several lengthy conversations about the Tribunal, the Treaty and the settlements process. It helps that a lot of our friends and their friends and family that we've spent time with lately are public servants and know quite a bit about the Tribunal and settlements process and have similar views on the subject.

For those who don't know much about the Tribunal and settlements process here's a quick overview. When the British arrived in New Zealand Maori had already been living here for a long time. In 1840 the British signed the Treaty of Waitangi with Maori. The Treaty has been breached in many ways since. A lot of Maori land was taken by the Crown in a variety of ways, there were a number of wars, Maori culture was suppressed. Basically Maori were forced to give up their traditional ways of living in favour of British ways. Over the last 30 odd years the government has been trying to provide some redress. The Waitangi Tribunal investigates claims brought by Maori about things the Government has done that have harmed them. Maori can then (or instead) negotiate with the Government for what financial, cultural and property redress will be part of a settlement package.

I have yet to have a conversation with someone who has a different opinion about Treaty settlements to me but I know there are plenty of people out there with such opinions. A lot of white New Zealanders don't like that the Government is giving money and land to Maori and doing things like changing the official names of mountains and rivers to their Maori names or promoting the Maori language. At the same time there are some Maori who think the settlements don't go far enough.

I know the Treaty settlements process is not perfect; no human-designed system attempting to bring about justice is. But at least we are trying. We are acknowledging that things that have happened in the past, and things that are still happening today, shouldn't have happened. Stopping the settlements process or changing it when some iwi have settled and others haven't would be even more unjust.

To those white New Zealanders who don't like the settlements process I would say you should take some time to learn about our history and all the injustices that have been perpetrated against Maori. If you say it wasn't me, it's not my generation that is to blame, I would say two things - how are you suffering from the Government settling with Maori? and Jesus paid the price not for his own sins but for those of others.

To those Maori who say the settlements process doesn't give enough to Maori I would encourage you to acknowledge that the Government is trying to put things right and it is unrealistic to expect them to give back the full value of what was taken from you. Most importantly I would encourage you to try to forgive.

Never underestimate the importance of humility, forgiveness and grace in every situation and relationship, from government-level bi-cultural relations to relationships between friends and family.